How to Handle Micromanagement with Strategic Indecision

When someone keeps overstepping, instead of pushing back, try letting their own behavior do the teaching.

There are several ways to address boundary violations. One of them is to allow the person to burn themselves out.

A long time ago, I worked for a severe micromanager who overruled pretty much any decision I made. I’m talking even down to the color I used to highlight cells in my spreadsheet.

For material matters, I would push back sometimes and explain why I thought a particular approach was more effective. It didn’t change anything, so I decided to go in the opposite direction.

👉 I stopped making any decisions when it came to working with them. I made them decide every detail of every assignment. Regardless of the size or significance.

After a couple of months, they started to insist that I learn how to make decisions on my own.

On the surface, this approach appears passive-aggressive. However, my intent wasn’t to punish my manager, but to change their pattern of behavior. So, I view it as strategic rather than punitive.

💡 Regardless of how you may interpret this solution, it is a viable alternative if you find yourself in a similar situation. However, like any boundary-setting approach, there are risks associated with it. So, buyer beware.

References: Watzlawick P, Weakland JH, Fisch R. Change: Principles of Problem Formation and Problem Resolution. WW Norton & Company; 1974.

Post Title: When someone keeps overstepping, instead of pushing back, try letting their own behavior do the teaching.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Casual Psych

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading